I was reading a sale pitch on using AI enabled algorithm to “convert” donor for generous giving. There are many superfluous words used in that article. And I can’t stop thinking,”what is the motivation / assumption used here?”
Does it mean with AI is better than without AI? Better in what ways? A more dollars being generated? So is this merely a number game; the more the better?
Knowing that AI is only available recently, does this mean that all prior to AI age is worse? By whose standard?
What if this is right (the number game is right, and the AI usage is right, for the end justifies the means)? What does it make us? A utilitarian? A very transactional and machine-like approach? Reminded me of my growing up learning about programming. It’s all about efficiencies, the shorter lines the better, the faster running the more supreme, and all measurement are metrics of different numbers.
Continue reading